tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2631429776292642259.post4792412554016949017..comments2024-02-14T04:37:42.427+02:00Comments on What's up on aprs.fi: Sortable tables and log Y scaleHessuhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12550787353137508264noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2631429776292642259.post-20718210381745326032009-12-28T07:17:24.057+02:002009-12-28T07:17:24.057+02:00Oba: Ok. Maybe I should make it sort by the distan...Oba: Ok. Maybe I should make it sort by the distance, then, while fixing the sort using the next (distance) column.Hessuhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12550787353137508264noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2631429776292642259.post-77074378336280523092009-12-28T04:47:21.218+02:002009-12-28T04:47:21.218+02:00Sorry, it was my misunderstanding. Since the colum...Sorry, it was my misunderstanding. Since the column titles says "longest," I thought it would sort the rows by distance, like (rx=>tx).<br /><br />73<br />Oba<br />JA7UDEOba JA7UDEhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13275410863404751666noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2631429776292642259.post-28282793848039324832009-12-28T01:24:55.158+02:002009-12-28T01:24:55.158+02:00VE6SRV: Yup, the distance sorting isn't workin...VE6SRV: Yup, the distance sorting isn't working very well, I'll have to provide numeric raw values for the sorting code instead of letting it figure out what kind of sort to do on the rather mixed-format column.<br /><br />Oba: The grid locator sort seems to work to me, it's an alphabetical sort. How exactly is it broken?Hessuhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12550787353137508264noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2631429776292642259.post-84680484550332991102009-12-28T01:20:16.628+02:002009-12-28T01:20:16.628+02:00The sorting function is cool! Thanks for the nice ...The sorting function is cool! Thanks for the nice addition. Let me report that the sorting on the grid locators seems not working correctly. Good day!<br /><br />73<br />Oba<br />JA7UDEOba JA7UDEhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13275410863404751666noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2631429776292642259.post-72822938865856408682009-12-27T20:57:06.238+02:002009-12-27T20:57:06.238+02:00Hey, the new log scale on the digi performance gra...Hey, the new log scale on the digi performance graph is great. Small values don't get lost in the noise now!<br /><br />I was playing with the new sorting capabilities, and think I found a little issue. The "stations near" graph initially gets rendered in ascending distance order. However, if you click on the header to sort by distance, it looks kind of like it is trying to sort alphabetically, rather than numerically... ie. 1.0km is lower than 230m which is also lower than 68m, but 95km is higher. It also goes a little wonky from left to right when it has an out of order distance to the left. It's not quite alpha sorting totally. Have a poke at it, and you'll see what's happening.<br /><br />Thanks for making the site better and better every day! 8)Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09715482024948994974noreply@blogger.com